Management of Complex Biliary Cases in A Tertiary Referral Setting: Real World Lessons and Their Role in Shaping Future Clinical Strategies
), Maria Satya Paramitha(2), Yulia Estu Pratiwi(3), Khek Yu Ho(4), Laurentius Adrianto Lesmana(5),
(1) - Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary Division, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Medical Faculty Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia - Digestive Disease & GI Oncology Center, Medistra Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia - Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, MRCCC Siloam Semanggi Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
(2) Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary Division, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Medical Faculty Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
(3) Digestive Disease & GI Oncology Center, Medistra Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
(4) Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
(5) - Digestive Disease & GI Oncology Center, Medistra Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia - Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, MRCCC Siloam Semanggi Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Abstract
Background: In the era of laparoscopic procedure, innovative non-surgical approaches have emerged for managing biliary tract disorders. Techniques such as therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are increasingly being utilized. However, a clear consensus on a stepwise approach to managing difficult biliary disorders remains elusive. Therefore, this study was performed to evaluate the impact of endoscopic approach management on the outcomes of complex biliary cases.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using an endoscopy database over two-year period. The characteristics of the study subjects, including demography and clinical data, were presented descriptively. The technical success rate was defined as the completion of the procedure performed on the patients. A bivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of therapy.
Results: Sixty-one subjects with similar proportions in malignant (44.3%) and non-malignant (55.7%) etiologies in this retrospective database study were considered as complex biliary cases. Among them, 16.4% underwent a combination of therapeutic ERCP and EUS in one session based on the complexity of the case. Additionally, 8.2% of the subjects underwent ERCP with additional single operator cholangioscopy procedure. One subject (1.6%) underwent a rendezvous ERCP procedure through a percutaneous approach, while 4.9% underwent EUS-guided biliary drainage procedure. This study revealed no significant association between all mortality outcomes and baseline characteristics of the patients. Furthermore, there were no significant associations between mortality and the need for re-intervention, post-procedural pain, or the occurrence of acute pancreatitis.
Conclusion: Complex biliary cases require a good clinical approach algorithm to decide which procedure comes first based on a comprehensive evaluation consisting of the patient’s factor, expertise, cost, and the risk of complications.
Keywords
References
Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR. Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 1999;117:632–639. doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70456-7. PMID: 10464139.
Aerts R, Penninckx F. The burden of gallstone disease in Europe. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18 Suppl 3:49–53. doi:10.1046/j.0953-0673.2003.01721.x. PMID: 14531741.
Boberg KM. The clinical burden of biliary disease: A global perspective. In: Hirschfield G, Adams D, Liaskou E, editors. Biliary disease: From science to clinic. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
Gourgiotis S, Kocher HM, Solaini L, Yarollahi A, Tsiambas E, Salemis NS. Gallbladder cancer. Am J Surg 2008;196:252–264. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.11.011. PMID: 18466866.
Kiran RP, Pokala N, Dudrick SJ. Incidence pattern and survival for gallbladder cancer over three decades – An analysis of 10,301 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:827–832. doi:10.1245/s10434-006-9224-4. PMID: 17109082.
Randi G, Franceschi S, La Vecchia C. Gallbladder cancer worldwide: Geographical distribution and risk factors. Int J Cancer 2006;118:1591–1602. doi:10.1002/ijc.21683. PMID: 16397865.
Shaib Y, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 2004;24:115–125. doi:10.1055/s-2004-828889. PMID: 15192785.
Everhart JE, Ruhl CE. Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part III: Liver, biliary tract, and pancreas. Gastroenterology 2009;136:1134–1144. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.038. PMID: 19245868.
Costi R, Gnocchi A, Di Mario F, Sarli L. Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy, and laparoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:13382–13401. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i37.13382. PMID: 25309071.
Herrera-Ramirez MA, Acevedo HL, Gomez-Pena GA, Mata Quintero CJ. The efficiency of laparoscopic vs endoscopic management in cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Cir Cir 2017;85:306–311. doi:10.1016/j.circir.2016.10.008. PMID: 28024730.
Ainsworth AP, Adamsen S, Rosenberg J. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Ugeskr Laeg 2007;169:1671–1674.
Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, Anderloni A, Arvanitakis M, Ah-Soune P, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2019;51. doi:10.1055/a-0862-0346. PMID: 30943551.
Balik E, Eren T, Keskin M, Ziyade S, Bulut T, Buyukuncu Y, et al. Parameters that may be used for predicting failure during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. J Oncol 2013. doi:10.1155/201681. PMID: 23861683.
Patel JA, Patel NA, Shinde T, Uchal M, Dhawan MK, Kulkarni A, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A case series and review of the literature. Am Surg 2008;74:689–693. PMID: 18705568.
Buxbaum JL, Fehmi SMA, Sultan S, Fishman DS, Qumseya BJ, Cortessis VK, et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;1:31. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001. PMID: 30979521.
Hindryckx P, Degroote H, Tate DJ, Deprez PH. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of the biliary system: Techniques, indications, and future perspectives. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019;11:103–114. doi:10.4253/wjge.v11.i2.103. PMID: 30788029.
O’Rourke RW, Lee NN, Cheng J, Swanstrom LL, Hansen PD. Laparoscopic biliary reconstruction. Am J Surg 2004;187:621–624. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.01.006. PMID: 15135678.
Wang X, Dai C, Jiang Z, Zhao L, Wang M, Ma L, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus laparoscopic exploration for common bile duct stones in post-cholecystectomy patients: A retrospective study. Oncotarget 2017;8:82114–82122. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.18839. PMID: 29137249.
Khan SA, Tavolari S, Brandi G. Cholangiocarcinoma: Epidemiology and risk factors. Liver Int 2019;39 Suppl 1:19–31. doi:10.1111/liv.14095. PMID: 30851228.
Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014;74:2913–2921. doi:10.1158/0008-5472. PMID: 24840647.
Viesca MFY, Arvanitakis M. Early diagnosis and management of malignant distal biliary obstruction: A review on current recommendations and guidelines. Clin Exp Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;12:415–432. doi:10.2147/CEG.S195714. PMID: 31807048.
Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou I, Blero D, Mangiavillano B, Schmidt A, et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: Indications, choice of stents, and results. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2018;50:910–930. doi:10.1055/a-06599864. PMID: 30086596.
De Lima SLA, Bustamante FAC, Moura EGH, Marques Bernardo WM, de Almeida Artifon EL, et al. Endoscopic palliative treatment versus surgical bypass in malignant low bile duct obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis 2015;5:35–46. doi:10.5348/ijhpd-2015-32-CR-7.
Lesmana CRA, Gani RA, Hasan I, Sulaiman AS, Ho KY, Dhir V, et al. Palliative endoscopic ultrasound biliary drainage for advanced malignant biliary obstruction: Should it replace the percutaneous approach? Case Rep Gastroenterol 2019;13:385–397. doi:10.1159/000502835. PMID: 31616233.
de Sousa GB, Machado RS, Nakao FS, Libera ED. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts using double pigtail plastic stents: A single tertiary center experience. Clinics 2021;76:e2701. doi:10.6061/clinics.2021/e2701.
Sharaiha RZ, Khan MA, Kamal F, Tyberg A, Tombazzi MLS, Ali B, et al. Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided biliary drainage in comparison with percutaneous biliary drainage when ERCP fails: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:904–914. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.023. PMID: 28063840.
Rustagi T, Aslanian HR. Endoscopic management of biliary leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014;48:674–678. doi:10.1097/MCG.000000000000000044. PMID: 24296422.
Abraham S, Rivero HG, Erlikh IV, Griffith LF, Kondamudi VK. Surgical and non-surgical management of gallstones. Am Fam Physician 2014;89:795–802. PMID: 24866215.
Article Metrics
Abstract View
: 747 times
Download : 91 times
DOI: 10.24871/25120242-10
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
