Association between Severity of Dyspepsia and Urea Breath Test Results in Patients with Positive Helicobacter pylori Serology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24871/192201879-82Keywords:
Dyspepsia, H. pylori, modified GDSS, UBT, SerologyAbstract
Background: Active Helicobacter pylori infection is considered to cause more severe dyspepsia symptoms compared to inactive infection. This study was aimed to determine the association between severity of dyspepsia and urea breath test (UBT) results in subjects with positive H. pylori serology.
Method: This study was a cross-sectional study in 60 subjects with positive H. pylori serology in Provincial General Hospital of West Nusa Tenggara. Severity of dyspepsia was measured using modified Glasgow Dyspepsia Severity Score (GDSS) questionnaire. Diagnosis of active H. pylori infection was made using 14C UBT examination.
Results: Proportion of active H. pylori infection in subjects with positive serology was 20%. The average of modified GDSS score in all patients was 1.95 (SD + 1.78), with minimal score of 0 and maximal score of 7. There was a statistically significant difference between average of modified GDSS score and positive and negative UBT results, (p = 0.027). The cut-off point value of modified GDSS to diagnose positive UBT was 3.8. Results of diagnostic test with modified GDSS as a test and UBT results as the gold standard indicated sensitivity of 41.6% and specificity of 85.4%.
Conclusion: There was a significant difference between modified GDSS score in patients and positive and negative H. pylori infection. In areas which did not have UBT examination, eradication in patients with positive serology and GDSS score of more than or equal to 4 could be considered.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).










