Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomyafter Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography (ERCP) Removal of Choledocholithiasis: An Evidence-based Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24871/2332022258-262Keywords:
early cholecystectomy, delayed cholecystectomy, ERCP, choledocholithiasisAbstract
Aim: To determine the preferred method of treatment in patients with choledocholithiasis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) by evaluating efficacy of early laparascopic cholecystectomy compared to delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Method: Literature searching was carried out on two databases, PubMed and Cochrane, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two randomized clinical trial (RCT) studies were appraised critically for validity, importance, and applicability.
Results: Early laparascopic cholecystectomy after ERCP shows lower outcomes in incidence of recurrent choledocholithiasis, acute cholecystitis, duration of hospitalization, and treatment costs (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two groups regarding the incidence of biliary adhesions, bleeding during cholecystectomy, and laboratory parameters such as total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT).
Conclusion: Early cholecystectomy, within three days after ERCP, is recommended for the treatment of choledocholithiasis after ERCP removal.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).










