Cost Effectiveness and Efficiency of Reusing Single-use Medical Devices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24871/151201425-30Abstract
Background: Reusing single-use medical devices is a very important and complicated process since theimplementation requires both operational and technical skills, even for professional users. The aim of our studywas to determine the cost effectiveness and efficiency of reusing single-use medical devices.
Method: The study was a cross-sectional study conducted between July and December 2013. It compared twogroups of patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) examination at the Digestive Endoscopy Center, Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta. Patients in the first group received new single-use medical devices; while patients in the other group received the re-used single-use medical devices.Reprocessing for reusing single-used medical devices was conducted according to standard procedures ofdecontamination and sterilization.
Results: Reusing medical devices were more commonly found (50.9%) in ERCP procedures than usingnew medical devices (49.1%). There was no significant difference on operator satisfaction between using there-used and new medical devices (p = 0.062). There was lower average cost for reusing medical devices thanusing new medical devices (IDR 198,818,250.00 vs. IDR 594,354,000.00; p = 0.000); percentage of successrate for reusing was lower than new medical devices (80% vs. 90,6%; p = 0.203). There was also no significantdifference regarding the negative impacts such as fever or infection of reusing medical devices compared tousing new medical devices (p = 0.676).
Conclusion: This study has shown good effectiveness in terms of operator satisfaction, success rate andimpacts on patients. The cost for reusing medical devices is more efficient than using new medical devices.
Keywords: effectiveness, efficiency, reusing medical devices, new, endoscopy
ABSTRAK
Latar belakang: Penggunaan alat medis sekali pakai (single-use) yang dipakai kembali (re-use) menjadi sangat penting dan kompleks dalam menerapkan kemampuan operasional dan teknik pada profesional penggunaalat tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai efektifitas biaya dan efisiensi penggunaan perangkatmedis single-use yang dijadikan re-use.
Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian potong lintang dilakukan pada Juli hingga Desember2013. Penelitian membandingkan dua kelompok pasien yang menjalani pemeriksaan endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography (ERCP) di Pusat Endoskopi Saluran Cerna (PESC), Rumah Sakit CiptoMangunkusumo, Jakarta. Pasien pada kelompok pertama menerima tindakan dengan alat medis baru; sedangkanpasien di grup lainnya menerima tindakan dengan alat medis re-use. Proses penggunaan alat medis re-use dilakukan sesuai dengan prosedur dekontaminasi dan sterilisasi yang berlaku.
Hasil: Penggunaan alat medis dalam tindakan ERCP lebih banyak menggunakan alat re-use (50,9%) dibandingkan alat baru (49,1%); kepuasan operator pada alat re-use maupun alat baru tidak berbeda secarasignifikan (p = 0,062); rata-rata biaya pada penggunaan alat re-use lebih rendah dibandingkan pada alat baru (Rp 198.818.250,00 vs. Rp 594.354.000,00; p = 0.000); persentase keberhasilan penggunaan alat re-use lebihrendah dibandingkan pada alat baru (80% vs. 90,6%; p = 0,203); dampak berupa terjadi demam atau infeksipada penggunaan alat re-use dan alat baru tidak menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan (p = 0,676).
Simpulan: Penggunaan alat re-use menunjukkan efektifitas yang baik pada kepuasan operator, keberhasilanalat, dan dampak pada pasien. Biaya penggunaan alat re-use lebih efisien dibanding dengan penggunaan alatbaru.
Kata kunci: efektifitas, efisiensi, perangkat medis re-use, baru, endoskopi
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).










